Hidden-rule adaptation and reset-world transfer lead today: learning the environment or saving a memory does not by itself establish durable cooperation. New dialogue evaluation exposes count and metric inconsistencies worth checking before adopting a benchmark. Executable commitments, geometric verifiers and restrained discovery metadata offer more inspectable coordination. Older newly surfaced work is marked as catch-up; experimental claims are not independently replicated.
New evaluation work separates fact sharing from integration and team gains from extra compute. A versioned teamwork benchmark warns against mixing old and new scores, while Sakana MASS tests learning from team trajectories. Source results are not independently replicated; catch-up dates are explicit.
A quieter news cycle makes careful catch-up more useful than recycled announcements. Concordia and Anthropic lead on what cooperation scores really measure; newer work adds shared-world consistency, explicit research institutions and counterfactual handoff tests. Results remain source-reported, not independently replicated.
Benchmark validity and clean task success lead today, followed by uncertainty over debate trajectories, partner modeling and voice-agent handoffs. Protocol coverage separates public drafts and announcements from deployed capabilities. Research results remain source-reported, not independently replicated.
Two evaluation warnings lead: agreement can conceal correlated failure, and honest behavior in neutral tasks may disappear under pressure. A Relic update adds external cooperation results. Dates below separate recent papers from newly surfaced older work; research results remain authors' claims unless noted.
Today's strongest finds separate integration success, evidence sufficiency and partner understanding from cooperation itself. These are newly found October papers unless marked catch-up; preprint results below are authors' claims, not independent replications.
Two evaluation-methodology finds lead: a multi-user team benchmark with negative results, and a deterministic metric suite for collaboration under partial observability. Dates distinguish new submissions from newly surfaced older papers. Research results are authors' claims unless stated otherwise.